
Published by the government of Zimbabwe
Mabasa Sasa
12 November 2008
opinion
WHEN Welshman Ncube walked out of the Sandton Convention Centre committee room where Sadc leaders had gathered to discuss Zimbabwe's Cabinet stand-off on Sunday, he had very few words for the media personnel eagerly waiting for any form of news from behind the closed door.
It is always an interesting encounter when journalists and lawyers are put in the same room.
The professions make up two-thirds of that breed of the human species that loves to hear the sound of its own voice and sincerely believes there is no melody more pleasing to the ear (the other third are politicians).
And after half a day of waiting for anything that can excite the readership, the journalists were almost bursting with anticipation that Ncube, the MDC secretary-general, would shoot his mouth off.
Instead, he had very few words for the media practitioners present.
"Tsvangirai must realise that he has reached the end of the road. The game is up," Ncube said before walking away.
And this perhaps best sums up the climax of the saga that has been playing itself out in Zimbabwe since President Mugabe's landslide June 27 election win and his magnanimous offer to enter into negotiations with the parties he had vanquished.
Normally, in a war situation the victor decapitates the enemy so that he does not have to face the same problem again.
President Mugabe chose, rather, to rehabilitate the opposition and present them with the opportunity to become part of the nation-building agenda.
And maybe it was at this point that Morgan Tsvangirai started overplaying his hand. Or maybe still, he started overplaying his hand on that day he tried to pull out of the June 27 run-off.
The West, who have for years advised and funded the opposition, thought President Mugabe was in a weak position and his offer to enter into dialogue meant he was ready to negotiate himself and the revolution out of political existence.
That is why they felt they could demand anything and everything and Cde Mugabe would obsequiously deliver it to them on a silver platter.
Buoyed by the loud noises coming from little people in Gaborone, Tsvangirai started to swell with expectation and began assuming the posture of a very powerful figure.
The ill-advised posturing came to a head when a few weeks ago Tsvangirai refused to travel to Swaziland for meeting of the Sadc Organ Troika because he did not want to use an emergency travel document.
No mistake should be made about this issue.
Our leaders are human and it is highly unlikely that they took too kindly to being made to run around like that by an opposition politician who has never held elected office and who even as Prime Minister will still be unelected.
It was a wonder that the Troika even agreed to reschedule the meeting for Tsvangirai's convenience and perhaps this only served to give him an even bigger impression of his status in Sadc.
As is known, that meeting failed to put a full stop on Zimbabwe's political impasse and Tsvangirai must have grown in self-esteem when his push for a full Sadc summit was acquiesced to.
But already, he had badly overplayed his hand.
When Zanu-PF told the Troika that they were not comfortable with Tsvangirai getting sole control of the Ministry of Home Affairs because of the alleged training of militias, the opposition leader should have counted his losses.
Political negotiations are much like gambling at a casino table with a set of players you do not really know much about.
And every gambler knows that the secret to survival is knowing when to walk away and knowing when to run.
Tsvangirai should have deduced that with the allegations on the table it was not in his best interests for the matter to be referred to a full summit.
And with memories of Renamo and Unita still fresh (and with the present instability in the DRC), Sadc would not be amused with him.
It could have been a case of reckless advice from his buddies in the West, a matter of sheer ignorance or the reception of false assurances from Gaborone.
Whatever it was, Tsvangirai went to Sandton, South Africa, believing Sadc would ignore the allegations, label President Mugabe an unreasonable negotiator, declare a deadlock and refer the matter to the AU and on to the UN Security Council.
It is obvious that for Tsvangirai the issue at stake is not the Ministry of Home Affairs.
MDC-T was actively pursuing a collapse of the talks hoping that an engineered sequence of events would lead to the staging of a fresh poll that would install Tsvangirai in State House and confine Cde Mugabe to Zvimba, or, better still for them, The Hague.
It was a serious gamble and he lost it badly.
On Saturday evening, Tsvangirai is said to have sought a meeting with President Mugabe in Sandton (he did after all travel with that much-reviled ETD, unless someone across the border issued him with another means of travelling).
Information available indicates that Tsvangirai wanted to explore ways in which the matter of militias could be withdrawn from the table.
President Mugabe reportedly declined to this meeting, pointing out that Tsvangirai himself is the one who had pressed for a full summit and he should find the spine somewhere to face regional leaders and look them in the eye.
Then on Sunday morning, just before the summit officially opened, a curious sight greeted onlookers as US Ambassador to Zimbabwe James McGee sought out Tsvangirai's advisors and reportedly gave them assurances that everything would be okay if they stuck to their guns (no pun intended).
And somewhere in that milieu of American and other Western diplomats and British MI6 agents milling around the venue and posing as journalists, briefly emerged a character called Christopher Dell.
At the official opening, Sadc chair President Kgalema Montlanthe of South Africa made it clear that the bloc would not tolerate any more pussyfooting.
Tsvangirai should have realised then that the summit would not entertain any reopening of negotiations and would not look favourably at the allegations on the table.
Though party officials from the three sides will not speak on record about what was said about the militia issue during the closed door sessions, it is understood that the matter was discussed at length, reports were tabled and tough decisions were made.
Politicians being politicians, they acted as if the issue was never mentioned, but a single line in the final communiqué hints otherwise.
"The Extraordinary Summit considered the political and security situation in Zimbabwe . . ."
This conclusive decision by summit came after much persuasion by a number of regional leaders after realising that the opposition was angling for a collapse of the talks.
Namibia, for one, was consistent in its view that Tsvangirai was trying to widen the agenda to include ministries other than the Home Affairs brief and yet the summit was specifically called to address this one outstanding issue.
In the end, even Botswana failed to give Tsvangirai the surcease he had wanted and now the attempt to take up a matter with the AU and UN is nothing more than face-saving antics of a gambler who has overplayed his hand.
Tsvangirai essentially has two options: to comply with Sadc or to pursue the reckless agenda set for him in far-away Western capitals.
Read comments. Write your own.
Copyright © 2008 The Herald. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com). To contact the copyright holder directly for corrections — or for permission to republish or make other authorized use of this material, click here.
AllAfrica aggregates and indexes content from over 125 African news organizations, plus more than 200 other sources, who are responsible for their own reporting and views. Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica.
Gt, It should not surprise anyone for Mabasa Sasa to be singled out and appear on the European/American sanctions list. The whole of Zimbabwe appears on that list and anyone who does not is simply a sellout. PERIOD. Infact all patriotic Zimbabweans should wish and strive to be on the list as this will show the whole world that we are a courageous and resilient people who brook no nonsense and interference from imperialists. Noone should fear inclusion as we are, afterall, suffering and dying under the sanctions that Tsvangirai called for.
The only people who should not be… [Read Full Text]
Tukunya ndebvu can you define the meaning of sell-out? Because I believe sell-out was used in the 50s through to the 70s. And with the current Zimbabwean Government it was legitimate until some ten years ago when it started to force itself and impose itself on people. Such words began to surface and the issue of sanction was used as an excuse of failure. Anyone opposing Mugabe was labelled as a sell-out indeed that is a cheap word which any reasonable person will tell you that is a propaganda word used by failures. Sanctions are well known among us as… [Read Full Text]
Gt, Who do you want to define the word sellout for you when a dictionary is right in front of you? Just look it up and immediately Tsvangirai will come to mind. Tsvangirai's selling out did not start when he became the leader of MDC. He betrayed the struggle in 1978 when he teamed up with the Rhodesia Special Branch and this resulted in the death of uncountable number of freedom fighters.
As if that was not enough, he sided with imperialists and employers at the expense of workers when he was ZCTU Secretary General. It was Tsvangirai who campaigned… [Read Full Text]
Tukunya Making allegations like you are doing is a clear example of Human rights abuse, denying children education and food is also human rights abuse we can go on and on about Zanu PF government. You will agree with me of their failures. Anyway that referendum was rejected because Zanu PF wanted to perpetuate its evil ways. By popular vote ZANU PF will never win in Zimbabwe ndopika naChirumhazu!! Ok Tuku
Lets see.
Lie number 1:He betrayed the struggle in 1978 when he teamed up with the Rhodesia Special Branch and this resulted in the death of uncountable number of freedom fighters.
Lie number 2: he sided with imperialists and employers at the expense of workers when he was ZCTU Secretary General.
Lie number 3: It was Tsvangirai who campaigned for the govt to stop announcing minimum wages on May Day and this was calculated to protect employers who did not want to pay the said wages.
Lie number 4: It was when Tsvangirai was at ZCTU that he vigorously opposed… [Read Full Text]
Awt_independent, You have not helped matters by breaking my post into itemised facts, if anything you have made it much better and easier for people to understsand what I am talking about. I thought you were then going to crash each point in turn.
Why don't you crash them one-be-one so that everybody can see whether I am lying or not. For instance tell the whole world where Tsvangirai was and what he was doing between 1977 and 1980, and why he happened to be at that place and not somewhere else. Tell me whether Tsvangirai is or is not… [Read Full Text]
Blah blah blah. Everyone knows you're a fool. How does it feel?
It seems to be the favourite Zanu tactic to accuse others for their own sins.
"...to achieve, fraudulently and through the barrel of the gun, what he failed to achieve through the ballot box."
Isn't this what the JOC did after they lost the election in March? For that matter, I have never heard of the March election results being published. Can anyone direct me to a link? I would love to see a comparison to the photos of the actual posted results at the polling stations. My understanding is that only a final number was… [Read Full Text]
Takunya, you and I both know that Tsvangirai never called for any sanctions against the people of Zimbabwe. You have no evidence of this, and its just a figment of your imagination. We all know that if you had any evidence you would be boasting it left right and centre. You only say this to divide the people of Zimbabwe and alienate Tsvangirai from his many many supporters. Do you think this is helpful? In times like this when Zimbabaweans should be coming together you seek to divide the people. Why is this?
See all comments.
Mabasa Sasa - it wont surprise anyone if you are of 170 people -> The "smart sanctions" target about 170 of the country's ruling elite, including Mugabe and his second wife, Grace, and include a travel ban and the freezing of foreign assets.